Electromyographic assessment of blink reflex throughout the transition from responsiveness to unresponsiveness during induction with propofol and remifentanil

• Type: Article in International Scientific Journal
• Date: 2020

Authors

Ferreira, A (Author) Other; Vide, S (Author) Other; Felgueiras, J (Author) Other; Cardoso, M (Author) Other; Nunes, C (Author) Other; Joaquim Mendes (Author) FEUP; Amorim, P (Author) Other

Journal

Title: Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing

ISSN: 1387-1307

Publisher: Springer Nature

Indexing

ISI Web of Knowledge - 0 Citations

Scopus - 0 Citations

Other information

Authenticus ID: P-00S-TR3

DOI: 10.1007/s10877-020-00593-w

Abstract (EN): General anesthesia is a reversible drug-induced state of altered arousal characterized by loss of responsiveness due to brainstem inactivation. Precise identification of the moment in which responsiveness is lost during the induction of general anesthesia is extremely important to provide information regarding an individual's anesthetic requirements and help intraoperative drug titration. To characterize the transition from responsiveness to unresponsiveness more objectively, we studied neurophysiologic-derived parameters of electromyographic records of electrically evoked blink reflex as a means of identifying the precise moment of loss of responsiveness. Twenty-five patients received a slow infusion of propofol until loss of corneal reflex while successive blink reflexes were elicited and recorded every 6 s. The level of anesthesia was assessed using an adapted version of the Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale. Different variables of the blink reflex components were calculated and compared to the adapted version of the Richmond Agitation-Sedation score and the estimated effect-site propofol concentration. Baselines of the blink reflex responses were similar to those in literature. After propofol infusion started, the most susceptible component of the blink reflex to propofol was R-2(EC50 = 1.358 (95% CI 1.321, 1.396) mu g/mL) and the most resistant was R-1(EC50 = 3.025 (95% CI 2.960, 3.090) mu g/mL). Most of the patients (24 out of 25) lost the R(1)component when they were still responsive to shaking and shouting and corneal reflex could be elicited clinically (time = 102.48 +/- 33.00 s). Habituation was present in R(2)but not in R-1. The R(1)component of the blink reflex was found to have a strong correlation with the adapted version of the Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale, with amplitude correlating better than areas (rho = - 0.721 (0.123) versus rho = - 0.688 (0.165)). We found a strong correlation between the R(1)component with the estimated propofol effect-site concentration, with amplitude correlating better than areas (rho = - 0.838 (0.113) versus rho = - 0.823 (0.153)) and between the clinical scale and the propofol concentration (rho = 0.856 (0.060)). The area and amplitude of the R(1)component showed to be indicators of predicting different levels of anesthesia (P-k = 0.672 (0.183) versus P-k = 0.709 (0.134)) and these are connected to the propofol concentrations (P-k = 0.593 (0.10)). Our results suggest that electrically evoked blink reflex could be used during the induction of anesthesia as a surrogate of the Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale to provide an objective endpoint as far as a - 4. At this point, at the moment of loss of R-1, the propofol infusion may be stopped, as overshooting increases slightly the effect-site concentration afterward and eventually reaching loss of responsiveness. If the desired target is not achieved, the infusion can then be resumed.

Language: English

Type (Professor's evaluation): Scientific

No. of pages: 11