Go to:
Logótipo
Comuta visibilidade da coluna esquerda
Você está em: Start > Publications > View > Assessing the publication impact using citation data from both Scopus and WoS databases: an approach validated in 15 research fields
Publication

Publications

Assessing the publication impact using citation data from both Scopus and WoS databases: an approach validated in 15 research fields

Title
Assessing the publication impact using citation data from both Scopus and WoS databases: an approach validated in 15 research fields
Type
Article in International Scientific Journal
Year
2020
Authors
Pech, G
(Author)
Other
The person does not belong to the institution. The person does not belong to the institution. The person does not belong to the institution. Without AUTHENTICUS Without ORCID
Journal
Title: ScientometricsImported from Authenticus Search for Journal Publications
Vol. 125 No. 2
Pages: 909-924
ISSN: 0138-9130
Publisher: Springer Nature
Other information
Authenticus ID: P-00S-KZ0
Abstract (EN): In a recent paper (10.1007/s11192-020-03386-9) we proposed a model to estimate the citations of an article in a database (Scopus/Web of Science) in which it is not indexed using the percentile rank of the database (Web of Science/Scopus) in which it is indexed. In this study we supplement the previous work with three advances: (1) by using 15 different research fields, corresponding to over 1 million papers, since we previously used only four fields; (2) by measuring the agreement between the percentile ranks in both databases using Lin's concordance correlation coefficient, since this coefficient has not been used previously to measure this agreement, but as a test with a sample of 15,400 papers to compare the actual and estimated number of citations; and (3) by using a robust data cleaning procedure. The results revealed a substantial concordance between percentile ranks of papers indexed in these two databases in all the research fields studied, and that this concordance is even stronger for high percentile values. This level of concordance suggests that we can consider the percentile of a paper in a database in which it is not indexed as being equal to the percentile of this paper in a database in which it is indexed. In other words, we increased the reliability of our previous conclusions that the percentile rank can be used as a citation database-normalization. The results of this study contribute to improve the use of citation counts in bibliometric studies, and to calculate research indicators when we need to use both bibliographic databases.
Language: English
Type (Professor's evaluation): Scientific
No. of pages: 16
Documents
We could not find any documents associated to the publication.
Related Publications

Of the same journal

The journal relative impact: an indicator for journal assessment (2011)
Article in International Scientific Journal
Vieira, ES; Gomes, JANF
The integration of African countries in international research networks (2022)
Article in International Scientific Journal
Vieira, Elizabeth S. ; Cerdeira, Jorge
The dynamic capabilities perspective of strategic management: a co-citation analysis (2017)
Article in International Scientific Journal
Fernandes, C; Ferreira, JJ; Raposo, ML; Estevao, C; Peris Ortiz, M; Rueda Armengot, C

See all (21)

Recommend this page Top
Copyright 1996-2025 © Faculdade de Direito da Universidade do Porto  I Terms and Conditions  I Acessibility  I Index A-Z
Page created on: 2025-07-21 at 11:46:01 | Privacy Policy | Personal Data Protection Policy | Whistleblowing