Range-wide patterns of human-mediated hybridisation in European wildcats

• Type: Article in International Scientific Journal
• Date: 2020

Authors

Tiesmeyer, A (Author) Other; Ramos, L (Author) Other; Lucas, JM (Author) Other; Steyer, K (Author) Other; Alves, PC (Author) FCUP; Astaras, C (Author) Other; Brix, M (Author) Other; Cragnolini, M (Author) Other; Domokos, C (Author) Other; Hegyeli, Z (Author) Other; Janssen, R (Author) Other; Kitchener, AC (Author) Other; Lambinet, C (Author) Other; Mestdagh, X (Author) Other; Migli, D (Author) Other; Monterroso, P (Author) Other; Mulder, JL (Author) Other; Schockert, V (Author) Other; Youlatos, D (Author) Other; Pfenninger, M (Author) Other; Nowak, C (Author) Other

Journal

Title: Conservation Genetics

Vol. 21

Pages: 247-260

ISSN: 1566-0621

Publisher: Springer Nature

Indexing

ISI Web of Knowledge - 25 Citations

Scopus - 28 Citations

Other information

Authenticus ID: P-00R-NSW

DOI: 10.1007/s10592-019-01247-4

Abstract (EN): Hybridisation between wild taxa and their domestic congeners is a significant conservation issue. Domestic species frequently outnumber their wild relatives in population size and distribution and may therefore genetically swamp the native species. The European wildcat (Felis silvestris) has been shown to hybridise with domestic cats (Felis catus). Previously suggested spatially divergent introgression levels have not been confirmed on a European scale due to significant differences in the applied methods to assess hybridisation of the European wildcat. We analysed 926 Felis spp. samples from 13 European countries, using a set of 86 selected ancestry-informative SNPs, 14 microsatellites, and ten mitochondrial and Y-chromosome markers to study regional hybridisation and introgression patterns and population differentiation. We detected 51 hybrids (four F1 and 47 F2 or backcrosses) and 521 pure wildcats throughout Europe. The abundance of hybrids varied considerably among studied populations. All samples from Scotland were identified as F2 hybrids or backcrosses, supporting previous findings that the genetic integrity of that wildcat population has been seriously compromised. In other European populations, low to moderate levels of hybridisation were found, with the lowest levels being in Central and Southeast Europe. The occurrence of distinct maternal and paternal markers between wildcat and domestic cat suggests that there were no severe hybridisation episodes in the past. The overall low (< 1%) prevalence of F1 hybrids suggests a low risk of hybridisation for the long-term genetic integrity of the wildcat in most of Europe. However, regionally elevated introgression rates confirm that hybridisation poses a potential threat. We propose regional in-depth monitoring of hybridisation rates to identify factors driving hybridisation so as to develop effective strategies for conservation.

Language: English

Type (Professor's evaluation): Scientific

No. of pages: 14