Resumo (PT):
Abstract (EN):
Active travel is enthusiastically promoted in the Western
world due to its clear and demonstrated individual and collective benefits. While active travel has been shown to be associated with features
of the built environment such as density and land-use mix, it is also
associated with walking and cycling accessibility—which we designate
as active accessibility. However, the measurement of active accessibility is not straightforward and it can represent significantly different
features of the built environment. This paper presents an extensive
review of published research that measures active accessibility. We
classified the literature into four categories based on the methodology
used: distance-based, gravity-based or potential, topological or infrastructure-based, and walkability and walk score-type measures. A fifth
category was created to classify outliers consisting of distinct methodological approaches or hybrids of the four main categories. We argue
that almost all of these methods have conceptual and computational
limitations, and that there are inconsistencies in the use of concepts
and terms. Furthermore, no sensitivity analysis was carried out on the
selected parameters. We conclude by presenting some guidelines that
might improve the value and clarity of active accessibility research,
theory, and practice.
Language:
English
Type (Professor's evaluation):
Scientific