Animality and rationality (on how John McDowell's Kantian view of moral experience could accommodate research on emotion)

• Type: Article in International Scientific Journal
• Date: 2019

Authors

Miguens, Sofia (Author) FLUP

Journal

Title: Con-Textos Kantianos: International Journal of Philosophy

No. 9

Pages: 293-308

ISSN: 2386-7655

Publisher: Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas. Instituto de Filosofía (IFS-CSIC)

Indexing

ISI Web of Science

Scopus

Dialnet

SHERPA/RoMEO

ERIH Plus

DOAJ

Latindex

Scientific classification

CORDIS: Humanities > Philosophy

Other information

DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.3253121

Resumo (PT): My main goal in this article is methodological: I want to spell out how a Kantian perspective could accommodate current empirical work on cognition, and in particular on emotion. Having chosen John McDowell as a guide, I try to characterize his view of moral experience and underline its Kantian traits (McDowell 1998a, 1998b, 1998c, 1998d, 1998e, 1998f). I start by identifying the conception of freedom as exemplified in the rational wolf thought experiment in Two Forms of Naturalism as the main Kantian trait. I then go through the characterization of two other crucial aspects of our moral experience – (responsiveness to) reasons and value. I suggest that McDowell’s approach to moral experience, although not itself strictly Kantian in all of its details, is an instance of a transformative view of rationality, as defended by Matthew Boyle (Boyle 2016) and that such transformative view is the key to accommodate empirical research on cognition within a Kantian perspective.

Language: English

Type (Professor's evaluation): Scientific