The history of cancer pain and bone-targeted agents: 10 most commonly asked questions

• Type: Another Publication in an International Scientific Journal
• Date: 2019

Authors

Pereira Vieira, CMP (Author) Other; Fragoso, M (Author) Other; Ferreira, M (Author) Other; Pereira, FF (Author) Other; Pereira, D (Author) Other; Rui Medeiros (Author) ICBAS

Journal

Title: Cancer Management and Research

Vol. 11

Pages: 37-46

ISSN: 1179-1322

Publisher: Dove Medical Press

Indexing

ISI Web of Knowledge - 3 Citations

Scopus - 3 Citations

Other information

Authenticus ID: P-00Q-1X4

DOI: 10.2147/cmar.s174731

Abstract (EN): The prevalence of pain and skeletal complications of metastatic bone disease is high and an important factor, which contributes to decreased quality of life and low survival rate. Bone-targeted agents are well-established therapies to reduce the skeletal-related events in patients with bone metastasis. However, the analgesic effect of these medications is still controversial. The objective of this review is to summarize the existing evidence about the use of bone-targeted agents in the treatment of metastatic bone pain, trying to answer to the 10 most commonly asked questions in this matter. To achieve this goal, authors did a research of reviews published between January 2001 and January 2018, using the terms MeSH: "cancer pain" and bisphosphonates. The source used was the PubMed (NLM) database. The search yielded 36 reviews, but only 16 met the inclusion criteria. Even with the introduction of a new class of drugs, bisphosphonates and specially zoledronic acid are the most commonly used drugs in most oncology centers. Bisphosphonates and denosumab appear to be beneficial in preventing skeletal morbidity but their analgesic role and impact on quality of life and survival are not so well established.

Language: English

Type (Professor's evaluation): Scientific

No. of pages: 10