Go to:
Logótipo
Comuta visibilidade da coluna esquerda
Você está em: Start > Publications > View > Stress path evolution in the ground due to railway traffic. Comparison between ballasted and ballastless track systems
Publication

Publications

Stress path evolution in the ground due to railway traffic. Comparison between ballasted and ballastless track systems

Title
Stress path evolution in the ground due to railway traffic. Comparison between ballasted and ballastless track systems
Type
Article in International Conference Proceedings Book
Year
2018
Authors
Ramos, A
(Author)
Other
The person does not belong to the institution. The person does not belong to the institution. The person does not belong to the institution. Without AUTHENTICUS Without ORCID
Correia, AG
(Author)
Other
The person does not belong to the institution. The person does not belong to the institution. The person does not belong to the institution. Without AUTHENTICUS Without ORCID
Alves Costa, P
(Author)
Other
The person does not belong to the institution. The person does not belong to the institution. The person does not belong to the institution. Without AUTHENTICUS Without ORCID
Conference proceedings International
Indexing
Other information
Authenticus ID: P-00Q-7PT
Abstract (EN): In this paper, a numerical study of the stress state evolution in the ground induced by the railway traffic is presented. The numerical models were developed considering two types of railway tracks: ballasted and ballastless tracks. Both structures were modelled in order to evaluate the differences obtained in terms of stresses under two different loading conditions: conventional passenger train (Alfa Pendular) and a freight train. The influence of the train speed and track irregularities were also studied. The numerical models were developed considering the 2.5D formulation based on FEM-PML approach. These results are a contribution to a better understanding the dynamic response of different track systems under distinct traffic scenarios and also to evaluate the comparative performance of the two systems. © 2018 Taylor & Francis Group, London, UK.
Language: English
Type (Professor's evaluation): Scientific
Documents
We could not find any documents associated to the publication.
Recommend this page Top
Copyright 1996-2025 © Faculdade de Direito da Universidade do Porto  I Terms and Conditions  I Acessibility  I Index A-Z
Page created on: 2025-07-12 at 15:04:43 | Privacy Policy | Personal Data Protection Policy | Whistleblowing