Go to:
Logótipo
Comuta visibilidade da coluna esquerda
Você está em: Start > Publications > View > The coaching process seen from the daily (and controversial) perspective of experts and coaches
Publication

Publications

The coaching process seen from the daily (and controversial) perspective of experts and coaches

Title
The coaching process seen from the daily (and controversial) perspective of experts and coaches
Type
Article in International Scientific Journal
Year
2019
Authors
Sarsur, Amyra Moyzes
(Author)
Other
View Personal Page You do not have permissions to view the institutional email. Search for Participant Publications Without AUTHENTICUS Without ORCID
Parente, Cristina
(Author)
FLUP
View Personal Page You do not have permissions to view the institutional email. Search for Participant Publications View Authenticus page View ORCID page
Indexing
DOAJ
Latindex
ProQuest
EBSCO
Scientific classification
CORDIS: Social sciences > Sociology
Other information
Resumo (PT):
Abstract (EN): Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to analyze the coaching process as perceived by experts and coaches, addressing its routine aspects and areas that are object of dissent in the organizational field. Design/methodology/approach – Qualitative research conducted through interviews with 20 experts and coaches who work in Portugal. Findings – Lack of consensus on conceptual approaches, few demands from organizations for concrete results, and elitism due to its selective use for high-level professionals. There is an expectation of companies that adopt a “coaching culture,” which includes participative actions, dialogue and humanization of relationships. There are benefits for organizations and professionals that result from its application, which raises care in considering it just another management fad. Originality/value – Professionals and organizations are increasingly adopting coaching processes, but there are few academic studies, with a scientific view, and more rarely from the perspective of practitioners (coaches). Hence, this topic lacks a more accurate approach, to better understand its application and extend the debate on controversial aspects, in order to make the discussion on its value more consistent.
Language: English
Type (Professor's evaluation): Scientific
Notes: Earlycite: Received - 18 July 2018; Revised - 13 February 2019; Accepted - 20 February 2019
Documents
We could not find any documents associated to the publication with allowed access.
Recommend this page Top
Copyright 1996-2025 © Faculdade de Direito da Universidade do Porto  I Terms and Conditions  I Acessibility  I Index A-Z
Page created on: 2025-07-21 at 21:05:58 | Privacy Policy | Personal Data Protection Policy | Whistleblowing