Detecting Journalistic Relevance on Social Media: A two-case study using automatic surrogate features

• Type: Article in International Conference Proceedings Book
• Date: 2017

Authors

Figueira, A (Author) FCUP; Guimarães, N (Author) Other

Conference proceedings International

Title: Proceedings of the 2017 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining 2017, Sydney, Australia, July 31 - August 03, 2017

Pages: 1136-1139

9th IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining, ASONAM 2017

31 July 2017 through 3 August 2017

Indexing

Scopus - 7 Citations

Other information

Authenticus ID: P-00N-6A7

DOI: 10.1145/3110025.3122120

Abstract (EN): The expansion of social networks has contributed to the propagation of information relevant to general audiences. However, this is small percentage compared to all the data shared in such online platforms, which also includes private/personal information, simple chat messages and the recent called `fake news¿. In this paper, we make an exploratory analysis on two social networks to extract features that are indicators of relevant information in social network messages. Our goal is to build accurate machine learning models that are capable of detecting what is journalistically relevant. We conducted two experiments on CrowdFlower to build a solid ground truth for the models, by comparing the number of evaluations per post against the number of posts classified. The results show evidence that increasing the number of samples will result in a better performance on the relevancy classification task, even when relaxing in the number of evaluations per post. In addition, results show that there are significant correlations between the relevance of a post and its interest and whether is meaningfully for the majority of people. Finally, we achieve approximately 80% accuracy in the task of relevance detection using a small set of learning algorithms. © 2017 Copyright is held by the owner/author(s).

Language: English

Type (Professor's evaluation): Scientific