Microemulsion cyclosporin formulation, in contrast to the old formulation, widens the T lymphocyte subsets differences between stable and acute rejection of kidney transplants

• Type: Article in International Scientific Journal
• Date: 2001

Authors

José Oliveira (Author) FMUP; Ramos, JP (Author) Other; Xavier, P (Author) Other; Sampaio, S (Author) Other; Magalhaes, MC (Author) Other; Mendes, AA (Author) Other; Pestana M (Author) FMUP

Journal

Title: Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation

Vol. 16

Pages: 1256-1261

ISSN: 0931-0509

Publisher: Oxford University Press

Indexing

ISI Web of Knowledge - 6 Citations

Scopus - 5 Citations

Other information

Authenticus ID: P-000-VDA

DOI: 10.1093/ndt/16.6.1256

Abstract (EN): Background. The new cyclosporin (CsA) formulation. Neoral(R), has different pharmacokinetics compared with Sandimmune(R) (SIM). Larger area under the curve (AUC) values with equivalent trough blood values are reached when Neoral is administered at equivalent doses to SIM. Previously, we showed a great diagnostic reliability when using cytofluorometric analysis from fine-needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) samples. We investigated possible changes brought about by Neoral on lymphocyte subsets and the repercussions on the activation score cut-off for acute rejection, defined under SIM treatment. Methods. Of 63 patients that received SIM, 40 remained rejection-free and 23 suffered one episode of rejection. Of 52 patients that received Neoral, 38 remained rejection-free. Peripheral blood lymphocytes (PBL) and lymphocytes from FNAB taken on days 7 and 14 post-transplantation and on the first day of acute rejection were analysed by flow cytometry. Results. Trough blood CsA levels were not different between SIM and Neoral treatments. Among rejection-free patients, a significant down-regulation of CD3DR and of CD8DR expression on both graft-infiltrating lymphocytes (GIL) and PBL, and significant up-regulation of naive T cells on GIL were observed with Neoral. These changes were followed by a significant down-regulation of the activation score with Neoral. Conversely, within the acute rejection group, the activation score was significantly higher with Neoral than with SIM. The activation score performed equally well in Neoral transplants compared with what we had reported with SIM. Conclusions. Our study indicates that Neoral elicits stronger immunosuppressive effects in stable patients, which eventually should translate into better clinical efficiency. However, when acute rejection supervenes, the treatment breakthrough seems stronger with Neoral. Cytofluorometric studies from FNAB samples showed that diagnostic reliability was maintained at a high level under Neoral therapy.

Language: English

Type (Professor's evaluation): Scientific

No. of pages: 6