Abstract (EN):
Nonlinear models are becoming a widely solution for seismic evaluation and design of new
structures. The implementation of those models in engineering practice requires robust
methodologies and guidelines about the consistent use of nonlinear analysis. Objective numerical
models must be developed or, at least, the extent of the accuracy of each possible solution must
be accounted for and its impact included within the safety verification framework. One particular
issue that affects distributed inelasticity models is the consistency of the numerical model
adopted. Not only is an analyst interested in global performance engineering demand parameters
but also code-based procedures require that local response should be used in the assessment stage.
Hence, it is important to reconcile local (Moment-curvature) and global (Force-drift) responses.
The simplified damage-following models presented herein try to circumvent some issues
associated with objectivity and user-dependent model selection. The considered models ensure
correct capture of hardening behavior ranges and an objective response during softening. This is
done by updating at each analysis step the inelastic zone length. A simple application is
considered comparing experimental results from 1 RC column and regularized beam models
available in OpenSees.
Language:
English
Type (Professor's evaluation):
Scientific
No. of pages:
4
License type: