Go to:
Logótipo
Comuta visibilidade da coluna esquerda
Você está em: Start > Publications > View > A Comparative Study of Platforms for Research Data Management: Interoperability, Metadata Capabilities and Integration Potential
Publication

Publications

A Comparative Study of Platforms for Research Data Management: Interoperability, Metadata Capabilities and Integration Potential

Title
A Comparative Study of Platforms for Research Data Management: Interoperability, Metadata Capabilities and Integration Potential
Type
Article in International Conference Proceedings Book
Year
2015
Authors
Amorim, RC
(Author)
FEUP
View Personal Page You do not have permissions to view the institutional email. Search for Participant Publications View Authenticus page View ORCID page
Castro, JA
(Author)
Other
The person does not belong to the institution. The person does not belong to the institution. The person does not belong to the institution. View Authenticus page Without ORCID
Cristina Ribeiro
(Author)
FEUP
View Personal Page You do not have permissions to view the institutional email. Search for Participant Publications View Authenticus page View ORCID page
Conference proceedings International
Pages: 101-111
World Conference on Information Systems and Technologies (WorldCIST)
Univ Azores, Ponta Delgada, PORTUGAL, APR 01-03, 2015
Other information
Authenticus ID: P-00A-D0W
Abstract (EN): Research data management is acknowledged as an important concern for institutions and several platforms to support data deposits have emerged. In this paper we start by overviewing the current practices in the data management workflow and identifying the stakeholders in this process. We then compare four recently proposed data repository platforms-DSpace, CKAN, Zenodo and Figshare-considering their architecture, support for metadata, API completeness, as well as their search mechanisms and community acceptance. To evaluate these features, we take into consideration the identified stakeholders' requirements. In the end, we argue that, depending on local requirements, different data repositories can meet some of the stakeholders requirements. Nevertheless, there is still room for improvements, mainly regarding the compatibility with the description of data from different research domains, to further improve data reuse.
Language: English
Type (Professor's evaluation): Scientific
No. of pages: 11
Documents
We could not find any documents associated to the publication.
Related Publications

Of the same authors

A comparison of research data management platforms: architecture, flexible metadata and interoperability (2017)
Article in International Scientific Journal
Amorim, RC; Castro, JA; da Silva, JR; Cristina Ribeiro
Ontologies for Research Data Description: A Design Process Applied to Vehicle Simulation (2015)
Article in International Conference Proceedings Book
Castro, JA; Perrotta, D; Amorim, RC; da Silva, JR; Cristina Ribeiro
Motivators and Deterrents for Data Description and Publication: Preliminary Results (2015)
Article in International Conference Proceedings Book
Cristina Ribeiro; da Silva, JR; Castro, JA; Amorim, RC; Fortuna, P
LabTablet: Semantic Metadata Collection on a Multi-domain Laboratory Notebook (2014)
Article in International Conference Proceedings Book
Amorim, RC; Castro, JA; da Silva, JR; Cristina Ribeiro
Engaging Researchers in Data Management with LabTablet, an Electronic Laboratory Notebook (2015)
Article in International Conference Proceedings Book
Amorim, RC; Castro, JA; da Silva, JR; Cristina Ribeiro
Recommend this page Top
Copyright 1996-2025 © Faculdade de Direito da Universidade do Porto  I Terms and Conditions  I Acessibility  I Index A-Z
Page created on: 2025-07-18 at 21:21:11 | Privacy Policy | Personal Data Protection Policy | Whistleblowing