A study on Error Correcting Output Codes

• Type: Article in International Conference Proceedings Book
• Date: 2005

Authors

Pimenta, E (Author) Other; João Gama (Author) FEP

Conference proceedings International

Title: 2005 PORTUGUESE CONFERENCE ON ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, PROCEEDINGS

Pages: 218-223

Portuguese Conference on Artificial Intelligence

Covilha, PORTUGAL, 2005

Indexing

ISI Web of Knowledge - 8 Citations

Other information

Authenticus ID: P-000-74Q

DOI: 10.1109/epia.2005.341298

Abstract (EN): Recent work points towards advantages in decomposing multi-class decision problems into multiple binary problems. There are several strategies for this decomposition. The most used and studied are All-vs-All, One-vs-All and the Error correction output codes (Ecocs). Ecocs appeared in the scope of telecommunications thanks to the capacity to correct transmission errors. This capacity is due to introducing redundancy when codifying messages. Ecocs are binary words and can be adapted to be used in classifications problems. They must, however, respect some specific constraints. The binary words must be further apart as much as possible. Equal or complementary columns cannot exist and no column can be constant (either 1 or 0). Given two ecocs satisfying these constrains, which one is more appropriate for classification purposes? In this work we suggest a function for evaluating the quality of Ecocs. This function is used to guide the search in the persecution algorithm, a new method to generate Ecocs for classifications purposes. The binary words that form the Ecocs can have several dimensions for the same number of classes that it intends to represent. The growth of these possible dimensions is exponential with the number of classes of the multi-class problem. In this paper we present a method to choose the dimension of the Ecoc that assure a good tradeoff between redundancy and error correction capacity. The method is evaluated in a set of benchmark classification problems. Experimental results are competitive against standard decomposition methods.

Language: English

Type (Professor's evaluation): Scientific

No. of pages: 6