Go to:
Logótipo
Comuta visibilidade da coluna esquerda
Você está em: Start > Publications > View > Probabilistic first-order theory revision from examples
Publication

Publications

Probabilistic first-order theory revision from examples

Title
Probabilistic first-order theory revision from examples
Type
Article in International Conference Proceedings Book
Year
2005
Authors
Paes, A
(Author)
Other
The person does not belong to the institution. The person does not belong to the institution. The person does not belong to the institution. Without AUTHENTICUS Without ORCID
Revoredo, K
(Author)
Other
The person does not belong to the institution. The person does not belong to the institution. The person does not belong to the institution. Without AUTHENTICUS Without ORCID
Zaverucha, G
(Author)
Other
The person does not belong to the institution. The person does not belong to the institution. The person does not belong to the institution. Without AUTHENTICUS Without ORCID
Costa, VS
(Author)
FCUP
View Personal Page You do not have permissions to view the institutional email. Search for Participant Publications View Authenticus page View ORCID page
Conference proceedings International
Pages: 295-311
15th International Conference on Inductive Logic Programming, ILP 2005
Bonn, 10 August 2005 through 13 August 2005
Indexing
Other information
Authenticus ID: P-007-E8B
Abstract (EN): Recently, there has been significant work in the integration of probabilistic reasoning with first order logic representations. Learning algorithms for these models have been developed and they all considered modifications in the entire structure. In a previous work we argued that when the theory is approximately correct the use of techniques from theory revision to just modify the structure in places that failed in classification can be a more adequate choice. To score these modifications and choose the best one the log likelihood was used. However, this function was shown not to be well-suited in the propositional Bayesian classification task and instead the conditional log likelihood should be used. In the present paper, we extend this revision system showing the necessity of using specialization operators even when there are no negative examples. Moreover, the results of a theory modified only in places that are responsible for the misclassification of some examples are compared with the one that was modified in the entire structure using three databases and considering four probabilistic score functions, including conditional log likelihood. © Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2005.
Language: English
Type (Professor's evaluation): Scientific
Documents
We could not find any documents associated to the publication.
Related Publications

Of the same authors

PFORTE: Revising probabilistic FOL theories (2006)
Article in International Conference Proceedings Book
Paes, A; Revoredo, K; Zaverucha, G; Costa, VS
Recommend this page Top
Copyright 1996-2025 © Faculdade de Direito da Universidade do Porto  I Terms and Conditions  I Acessibility  I Index A-Z
Page created on: 2025-07-19 at 20:09:26 | Privacy Policy | Personal Data Protection Policy | Whistleblowing