Flexibility among adolescents - A contribution to global evaluation [A flexibilidade em adolescentes - Um contributo para a avaliação global]

• Type: Article in International Scientific Journal
• Date: 2006

Authors

da Silva, DDJL (Author) Other; dos Santos, JAR (Author) Other; de Oliveira, BMPM (Author) FCNAUP

Journal

Title: Revista Brasileira de Cineantropometria & Desempenho Humano

Vol. 8 No. 1

Pages: 72-79

ISSN: 1415-8426

Publisher: Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)

Indexing

ISI Web of Knowledge

Scopus - 4 Citations

Other information

Authenticus ID: P-00A-D05

Abstract (EN): The present study intended to assess flexibility of adolescents of both sexes, involving several body regions and articular groups; to compare males with females, to establish, by factor analyses, inter-tests correlations, in order to obtain explanations of the result in original variables and, to verify which principal components, by reduction of the number of correlated variables, are susceptible to better explain variability. The sample is constituted by 52 subjects (28 females and 24 males), aged between 15 and 18 years. Flexibility assessment battery was formed by eight tests: sit and reach (SA), v-sit and reach (V-SA), stand and reach (FTFP), trunk lift (ET), arm-trunk lift (ETB), side bending (FLT-D e FLTE), shoulder stretch (AMAC-D e AMAC-E) and, bend and reach (AAA). The main results showed, in general, a balance in both sexes as far as the ability to perform wide movements is concerned. There is a strong association: 1) among similar technical characteristic tests, which seems there is no need for cumulative use among these tests, and 2) among those tests that have direct effects on laterality, AMAC-D/AMAC-E (except males) and FLT-D/FLT-E. The AAA test did not correlate with any of the performed tests, particularly in males. Factor analyses of principal components (CP) showed the existence of three components in the female group, with eigenvalues higher than 1, explaining 83,2% of total variance, while in the male group four components were necessary to explain 88,8% of total variability. The tests that were more strongly correlated with each one of principal components were: 1) for males: SA, FTFP, V-SA (CP1), FLT-D, FLT-E (CP2), AMAC-D, AAA (CP3), and ETB, ET (CP4); 2) for females: AAA, FLT-E, AMAC-D, AMAC-E, FTFP (CP1), V-SA, SA, FTFP (CP2), and ETB, ET (CP3).

Language: English

Type (Professor's evaluation): Scientific