Abstract (EN):
Rework Management in software development is a challenging and complex
issue. Defined as the effort spent to re-do some work, rework implies big costs
given the fact that the time spent on rework does not count to the improvement of the
project. Predicting and controlling rework causes is a valuable asset for companies,
which maintain closed policies on choosing team members and assigning activities
to developers. However, a trending growth in development consists in Open Source
Software (OSS) projects. This is a totally new and diverse environment, in the sense
that not only the projects but also their resources, e.g., developers change dynamically.
There is no guarantee that developers will follow the same methodologies
and quality policies as in a traditional and closed project. In such world, identifying
rework causes is a necessary step to reduce project costs and to help project
managers to better define their strategies. We observed that in real OSS projects
there are no fixed team, but instead, developers assume some kind of auction in
which the activities are assigned to the most interested and less-cost developer. This
lead us to think that a more complex auctioning mechanism should not only model
the task allocation problem, but also consider some other factors related to rework
causes. By doing this, we could optimise the task allocation, improving the development
of the project and reducing rework. In this paper we presented MAESTROS,
a Multi-Agent System that implements an auction mechanism for simulating task
allocation in OSS. Experiments were conducted to measure costs and rework with
different project characteristics. We analysed the impact of introducing a Q-learning
reinforcement algorithm on reducing costs and rework. Our findings correspond to a reduction of 31 % in costs and 11 % in rework when compared with the simple
approach. Improvements to MAESTROS include real projects data analysis and a
real-time mechanism to support Project Management decisions.
Language:
English
Type (Professor's evaluation):
Scientific
No. of pages:
13
License type: