Go to:
Logótipo
Comuta visibilidade da coluna esquerda
Você está em: Start > Publications > View > Argumentation as distributed belief revision: Conflict resolution in decentralised co-operative multi-agent systems
Publication

Publications

Argumentation as distributed belief revision: Conflict resolution in decentralised co-operative multi-agent systems

Title
Argumentation as distributed belief revision: Conflict resolution in decentralised co-operative multi-agent systems
Type
Article in International Conference Proceedings Book
Year
2001
Authors
malheiro, b
(Author)
Other
The person does not belong to the institution. The person does not belong to the institution. The person does not belong to the institution. View Authenticus page Without ORCID
oliveira, e
(Author)
FEUP
View Personal Page You do not have permissions to view the institutional email. Search for Participant Publications View Authenticus page View ORCID page
Conference proceedings International
Pages: 205-218
10th Portuguese Conference on Artificial Intelligence, EPIA 2001
Porto, 17 December 2001 through 20 December 2001
Indexing
Publicação em ISI Web of Knowledge ISI Web of Knowledge
Publicação em Scopus Scopus - 0 Citations
Other information
Authenticus ID: P-008-6VQ
Abstract (EN): Decentralised co-operative multi-agent systems are computational systems where conflicts are frequent due to the nature of the represented knowledge. Negotiation methodologies, in this case argumentation based negotiation methodologies, were developed and applied to solve unforeseeable and, therefore, unavoidable conflicts. The supporting computational model is a distributed belief revision system where argumentation plays the decisive role of revision. The distributed belief revision system detects, isolates and solves, whenever possible, the identified conflicts. The detection and isolation of the conflicts is automatically performed by the distributed consistency mechanism and the resolution of the conflict, or belief revision, is achieved via argumentation. We propose and describe two argumentation protocols intended to solve different types of identified information conflicts: context dependent and context independent conflicts. While the protocol for context dependent conflicts generates new consensual alternatives, the latter chooses to adopt the soundest, strongest argument presented. The paper shows the suitability of using argumentation as a distributed decentralised belief revision protocol to solve unavoidable conflicts. © Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2001.
Language: English
Type (Professor's evaluation): Scientific
No. of pages: 14
Documents
We could not find any documents associated to the publication.
Related Publications

Of the same authors

Improving assumption based distributed belief revision (1995)
Article in International Conference Proceedings Book
malheiro, b; oliveira, e
Environmental decision support (1997)
Article in International Conference Proceedings Book
Malheiro, B; Eugénio Oliveira
Consistency and Context Management in a Multi-Agent Belief Revision Testbed (1995)
Article in International Conference Proceedings Book
Malheiro, B; Eugénio Oliveira
An intelligent distributed system for environmental management (1995)
Article in International Conference Proceedings Book
malheiro, b; oliveira, e
Recommend this page Top
Copyright 1996-2025 © Faculdade de Direito da Universidade do Porto  I Terms and Conditions  I Acessibility  I Index A-Z
Page created on: 2025-07-28 at 07:36:36 | Privacy Policy | Personal Data Protection Policy | Whistleblowing