Go to:
Logótipo
Comuta visibilidade da coluna esquerda
Você está em: Start > Publications > View > Scientific Excellence and Equality at University: Experiencing the RESET Project
Publication

Publications

Scientific Excellence and Equality at University: Experiencing the RESET Project

Title
Scientific Excellence and Equality at University: Experiencing the RESET Project
Type
Book
Year
2025
Authors
Paoletti, Marion
(Editor)
Other
The person does not belong to the institution. The person does not belong to the institution. The person does not belong to the institution. Without AUTHENTICUS Without ORCID
Matias, Marisa
(Editor)
Other
The person does not belong to the institution. The person does not belong to the institution. The person does not belong to the institution. Without AUTHENTICUS Without ORCID
Rózalska, Aleksandra
(Editor)
Other
The person does not belong to the institution. The person does not belong to the institution. The person does not belong to the institution. Without AUTHENTICUS Without ORCID
Scientific classification
CORDIS: Social sciences > Sociology
Other information
Resumo (PT):
Abstract (EN): Since 2015, the EU has been recommending and actively supporting the implementation of GE Plans (GEPs) in academic and research organisations. GEPs aim to address persistent gender inequalities in research and academic careers by moving along three axes envisaged by the European Research Area: i) to remove legal and other barriers to the recruitment, retention, and career progression of female researchers, ii) to address gender imbalances in decision-making processes, and iii) to strengthen the gender dimension in research (Council of the European Union, 2015). Despite the commitment of the EC to mainstream GE in research and innovation, the potential of GEPs to generate institutional and cultural change in universities is a contested matter. The use of efficiency arguments (e.g., economic outcomes of gender equality) to justify policy interventions and the predominance of conservative frameworks on GE to inform the measures are some of the critiques. Thus, current research and innovation framework programmes also refer to a gender+ strategy (e.g., intersectional approaches), meaning that gender remains the primary contemplated type of inequality. Still, its interaction with other sources of inequality and grounds of discrimination must be considered in the design and implementation of measures. RESET GEPs have aligned with this requirement and, from inception, have used intersectionality as an analytical tool for studying, understanding, and responding to the ways in which sex and gender intersect with other personal characteristics. This chapter will describe RESET partners’ experiences designing, implementing, and mainstreaming intersectional GEPs, reflecting upon the barriers and challenges of gender mainstreaming in contemporary higher education systems.
Language: English
Type (Professor's evaluation): Scientific
No. of pages: 226
Electronic ISBN: 9781003564348
Documents
We could not find any documents associated to the publication.
Publications included
Chapter or Part of a Book
Marisa Matias (Author) (FPCEUP); Sara Isabel Magalhães (Author) (FPCEUP); Jorge Peixoto Freitas (Author) (REIT); Lopes, Alexandra (Author) (FLUP); Conceição Nogueira (Author) (FPCEUP); Dias, Isabel (Author) (FLUP)
2025
Recommend this page Top
Copyright 1996-2025 © Faculdade de Direito da Universidade do Porto  I Terms and Conditions  I Acessibility  I Index A-Z
Page created on: 2025-09-29 at 07:11:25 | Privacy Policy | Personal Data Protection Policy | Whistleblowing | Electronic Yellow Book