Go to:
Logótipo
You are in:: Start > Publications > View > Animal brains and the work of words: Daniel Dennett on natural language and the human mind
Map of Premises
FC6 - Departamento de Ciência de Computadores FC5 - Edifício Central FC4 - Departamento de Biologia FC3 - Departamento de Física e Astronomia e Departamento GAOT FC2 - Departamento de Química e Bioquímica FC1 - Departamento de Matemática
Publication

Animal brains and the work of words: Daniel Dennett on natural language and the human mind

Title
Animal brains and the work of words: Daniel Dennett on natural language and the human mind
Type
Article in International Scientific Journal
Year
2022
Authors
Miguens, Sofia
(Author)
FLUP
View Personal Page You do not have permissions to view the institutional email. Search for Participant Publications Without AUTHENTICUS View ORCID page
Journal
Vol. 41 No. 3
Pages: 599-607
ISSN: 0167-7411
Publisher: Springer Nature
Indexing
Publicação em Scopus Scopus
EBSCO
Humanities International Complete (EBSCO)
Humanities Source Ultimate (EBSCO)
Google Scholar
Worldcat OCLC
ProQuest
Current Contents
ERIH Plus
Scientific classification
CORDIS: Humanities > Philosophy
Other information
Resumo (PT):
Abstract (EN): In this article I discuss Daniel Dennett’s view of the role of natural language in the evolution of the human mind. In contrast with defenders of the Language of Thought Hypothesis, Dennett claims that natural language is an evolved tool for communication, originating in behavioural habits of which users were initially not aware. Once in place, such habits changed access to information in human brains and were crucial for the evolution of human consciousness. I assess Dennett’s approach from the viewpoint of philosophy of mind and language and consider its ontological implications. I contrast Dennett’s views with the universalist and internalist claims of Jerry Fodor and Noam Chomsky and show how, by appealing to memes and cultural evolution, Dennett resists such claims. I then analyse how this picture goes together with a deflationary view of consciousness. I end by pointing out that although Dennett’s global picture seems to point towards a pluralistic ontology, he himself refrains from taking such a step.
Language: English
Type (Professor's evaluation): Scientific
Notes: Published: 15 April 2021
Documents
We could not find any documents associated to the publication.
Related Publications

Of the same scientific areas

Accessus. Filosofia Medieval (2013)
Educational Publication
José Meirinhos
Accessus (2012)
Educational Publication
José Meirinhos
Utopia (2018)
Another Publication in Book Form
Paulo Tunhas
Risco (2018)
Another Publication in Book Form
Tunhas, Paulo
Relativismo (2018)
Another Publication in Book Form
Romão, Rui

See all (246)

Of the same journal

Williams’ relativism and the moral point of view: a challenge by Cora Diamond (2024)
Article in International Scientific Journal
Miguens, Sofia
The ‘meeting of bodies’: empathy and basic forms of shared experiences (2019)
Article in International Scientific Journal
Ciaunica, Anna
Introduction: the relational self: basic forms of self-awareness (2020)
Article in International Scientific Journal
Ciaunica, Anna
Beyond the ancient and the modern: thinking the tragic with Williams and Kitto (2024)
Article in International Scientific Journal
Bento, Sílvia
Recommend this page Top
Copyright 1996-2024 © Faculdade de Ciências da Universidade do Porto  I Terms and Conditions  I Acessibility  I Index A-Z  I Guest Book
Page created on: 2024-09-27 at 14:29:14 | Acceptable Use Policy | Data Protection Policy | Complaint Portal