Go to:
Comuta visibilidade da coluna esquerda
Você está em: Start > AE311

Art and Space

Code: AE311     Acronym: AE

Classification Keyword
OFICIAL Fine Arts/Sculpture

Instance: 2021/2022 - 2S Ícone do Moodle

Active? Yes
Responsible unit: Fine Arts Department
Course/CS Responsible: Fine Arts

Cycles of Study/Courses

Acronym No. of Students Study Plan Curricular Years Credits UCN Credits ECTS Contact hours Total Time
AP 16 Plano de estudos de LAP_publicaçao em DR de 24/05/2021 3 - 6 60 162

Teaching Staff - Responsibilities

Teacher Responsibility
Rute Ribeiro Rosas

Teaching - Hours

Theoretical and practical : 4,00
Type Teacher Classes Hour
Theoretical and practical Totals 1 4,00
Rute Ribeiro Rosas 1,00

Teaching language



Subject’s general context Consolidate and focus on the knowledge acquired by the student in the previous years, in the sphere of sculpture, working specifically the volumes’/volumetries’ construction from space, as consequence of a project’s practice. Promote the confrontation with space as art’s essence, finding out the conceptual differences in the applying and developing of the project’s processes as well as in the implied technical processes. Being acquainted with methodologies and sculpture’s execution processes as a project’s and technical process specific of constructuion/ intervention of/ in space; knowing the means, the materials and the expressive languages involved; denoting availability to experiment and inovate, having the capacity to materialize the enunciated projects, maximizing an individual formal language. Subject’s specific context Being able to interpret and analyse a public space of small or medium scale, and define its characteristics as a place. Knowing to use the means, the processes and the taught content in the developing of artistic projects directed to the place, bearing in mind the physical dimensions as well as the conceptual, contextual (implications of artistic scope and of disciplinary transversality) and temporal dimensions, creating and producing through individual or team work.

Learning outcomes and competences

Have acquired the capacity and respective tools to interpret and analyze a space or a public space for small or medium scale and define its characteristics as place. Learn to use the means, processes and contents taught in the development of artistic projects addressed to the place, taking into account, conceptual, contextual temporal physical dimensions (artistic scope and implications of disciplinary transversality) and creating and producing individual or team.

Working method


Pre-requirements (prior knowledge) and co-requirements (common knowledge)

Doesn't exist.


New approaches to disciplines from the Social Sciences, such as Cultural Studies or Critical Geography, have fostered a territory of reflection that has not been alienated from other disciplines of knowledge, thought and / or practice. The dynamic sense of the notion of space arising from this new interdisciplinarity can not fail to influence the artistic practice interested in investigating the spatiality either by the sculptural path either by the symbolic path or by conceptual or critical motives.

Briefly, Art and Space is based on Space as a structuring element of Plastic Arts, concretely in the relations between Space and Sculpture, between Space and Architecture and other areas of knowledge: Historical, Anthropological and Sociological, in a perspective of cultural contextualization and historical perspective of the diverse notions and approaches of Space and with particular attention to the nineteenth and twentieth centuries and its repercussions on current thinking and practices. Scale, size, operability; Space, Place and Composition. Sculpture object; Installation; Site and Non-Site; Place, Territory and Landscape
The curricular unit aims to encourage the investigation of the connections between artistic practice and any of those (or other) approaches to spatiality, articulating with other theoretical-practical curricular units of Atelier or Project, but allowing the development of two-dimensional space analytical tools, three-dimensional or temporal, and looking for specific ways of exploiting those dynamics in the proposed projects.
This curricular unit proposes, therefore, the structuring and development of projects that investigate various notions of space, in meaning and differentiation between, for example: public space and private space, interior space and outer space, positive space and negative space, real space and virtual space, limited space and infinite space, open space and closed space, space / time, permanence / passage.

Mandatory literature

Lefebvre Henri 1901-1991; The^Production of space. ISBN: 0-631-18177-6
Tuan Yi-Fu; Space and place. ISBN: 0-8166-0884-9
Burgin Victor; In / different spaces. ISBN: 0-520-20299-6
Bachelard, Gaston; La^poétique de l.espace
Miles Malcolm; Art, space and the city.. ISBN: 0-415-13943-0
Coles Alex ; Site-specificity. ISBN: 1-901033-12-0
Mitrasinovic Miodrag; Total landscape, the parks, public space.. ISBN: ISBN: 0-7546-4333-6
ULL; Espace sculpture. ISBN: ISBN: 0821-9222
Suderburg Erika; Space, site, intervention.. ISBN: 0-8166-3159-X

Complementary Bibliography

WEISS, A.; Unnatural horizons: paradox and contradition in landscape architecture. New York:., Princeton Architectural Press, 1998. ISBN: 1-56898-139-2

Teaching methods and learning activities

Summary The subject “Art and space” is based on space as essence of art. The discovery of space as artistic quality, in the 20th century’s purity (?), and the historical reorientations to which it led in the passing of all this century, established new relations between space and sculpture, between space and architecture and a new condition for the relation of sculpture with architecture and even other subjects, of which Landscape Architecture stands out. “Art and Space” is naturally drawn to the execution of creative and investigation projects, single or in groups, at the project’s level (in small scale and with previous model) and its natural scale materialization that, when possible, respects the adressed principles under the above mentioned concepts. The technological matters and ambiences will be of free choice, according to the possibilities offered by FBAUP’s atliers.

Evaluation Type

Distributed evaluation without final exam

Assessment Components

Designation Weight (%)
Participação presencial 20,00
Trabalho escrito 20,00
Trabalho laboratorial 60,00
Total: 100,00

Amount of time allocated to each course unit

Designation Time (hours)
Elaboração de projeto 10,00
Estudo autónomo 20,00
Frequência das aulas 40,00
Trabalho de investigação 30,00
Trabalho laboratorial 30,00
Total: 130,00

Eligibility for exams

The assessment is continuous without loss if combined with other assessment methods, namely of two inserted assessment moments and one final assessment moment (with dates to be defined in the beginning of the semester between the teachers) and the students. The assiduous presence in classes shall assure qualitative and quantitative information at any time, independently of the fixed assessment periods. An attendance register for each student will be made by the teacher. The afore mentioned qualitative and quantitative information is assured through the regular developing of the practical works and of its theoretical reflection framing, as well as its discussion. Final assessment/classification factors: the effective student’s presential participation in the class/atlier; the performance and concretion capacity at a technical level; the capacity to experiment and be open minded towards risk; the quality of the concluded work; the registration of the work developed along the semester in paper and/or digital diary; the investigation and development of theoretical contents.

Calculation formula of final grade

Final classification equal or superiro to 10 (ten). Final evaluation’s calculation Assiduous presence and fulfilling of what is established in the subject’s syllabus.

Examinations or Special Assignments

Students must perform the two proposed exercises: one designed to work on a small-scale interior space; another dedicated to working on a larger, outdoor space. Both must be developed in several stages, in process from an initial proposal. To start the 1st work, students must present the appropriate answer to the proposal orally before the class, develop the proposal and make a final presentation before the teacher and classmates. For Exercise No. 2, students must respond to a proposed notice, also select a space (a place, a place), survey the spaces they intend to work at the most diverse levels and disciplines and areas of knowledge, as well as, through freehand drawing, various records - photography, video, audio (without prejudice to other means), morphologically studying the place and circumstances of your future intervention proposal. At this stage, the scale to be worked on will be reduced in relation to the eventual project to be conceived for that public or private space, interior or exterior, which will include the respective description or descriptive memory sufficiently clarifying to clarify the object / construction / intervention to be carried out in true greatness. The project may not dispense with scale model and / or simulation in digital format and environment. Students will choose the technological environments that best adapt to the nature and sensitivity of the projects to be developed. This exercise will be presented in a project dossier format.

Special assessment (TE, DA, ...)

The evaluation is continuous without prejudice to the combination with other types of evaluation, namely two moments of mid-term evaluation and one moment of final evaluation (with dates defined according to the Faculty's timetable). The two mid-term evaluations are informative and the final evaluation is binding, all of them expressed in a quantitative way, although it also reflects a dimension of qualitative evaluation. Assiduous attendance at classes should ensure qualitative and quantitative information at any time, regardless of the periods set for the assessment, with the development of works being essential in the classroom / atelier spaces, at FBAUP or in other places defined for that purpose, within the periods of assessment. classroom or outside. The student is required to fulfill a minimum of 75% of classes. The teacher will record each student's attendance. The referred qualitative and quantitative information is ensured through the regular development of practical work and the respective framework for theoretical reflection as well as its discussion. The final evaluation / classification factors are: the student's actual presence in class / workshop spaces and other scheduled models; performance and ability to achieve at the project and technical level; the capacity for experimentation and openness to innovation; the quality of the work completed; the register of the work developed during the entire Semester, in paper and / or digital format, including research and development of the theoretical contents carried out.

Classification improvement

By frequency in the following academic year.

Recommend this page Top
Copyright 1996-2021 © Faculdade de Belas Artes da Universidade do Porto  I Terms and Conditions  I Acessibility  I Index A-Z  I Guest Book
Page created on: 2021-11-27 at 15:06:22