Measurement of mass transfer between the bubble and dense phases in a fluidized bed combustor

• Type: Article in International Scientific Journal
• Date: 1999

Authors

Campos, JBLM (Author) FEUP; Mota, ODS (Author) FEUP; Pinto, AMFR (Author) FEUP

Journal

Title: Combustion and Flame

Vol. 116

Pages: 105-119

ISSN: 0010-2180

Publisher: Elsevier

Indexing

ISI Web of Knowledge - 6 Citations

Scopus - 6 Citations

Scientific classification

FOS: Engineering and technology > Environmental engineering

Other information

Authenticus ID: P-001-5FA

DOI: 10.1016/s0010-2180(98)00043-1

Resumo (PT): É apresentada uma teoria que permite quantificar a transferência de massa entre as bolhas e a fase densa de um leito fluidizado: durante a formação da bolha e durante a sua ascenção no leito. O trabalho experimental decorreu num leito fluidizado à escala laboratorial e permitiu validar a teoria.

Abstract (EN): An experimental study is described on mass transfer between the bubble and dense phases in a fluidized bed, used as a coke combustor. The experimental technique allowed quantification of the mass transfer rate during bubble formation and during a bubble's rise through the bed. The combustion experiments were performed at 1 atm and 1223 K, in a fluidized bed (i.d. 120 mm) of sand (average diam. 325 mu m) with static heights of 0.10-0.21 m. The bubbling flow rare ranged from 2.5 to 5.0 times that at incipient fluidization. The coke particles were 3.0 or 3.5 mm in diameter. Results indicate that the equivalent bed height, L-eq (the height a bubble must rise to transfer to the dense phase the same quantity of oxygen as during its formation) is independent of the bubbling air flow rate. The mean value L-eq = 50 mm suggests that for shallow beds the mass transferred during bubble formation is a significant part of the total mass transferred. The measured mass transfer factor between phases during a bubble's rise (x' = X/L-mf) is independent of the bubbling air flow rate and substantially lower than the theoretical predictions of Kunii and Levenspiel [1]. This disagreement is explained by the fact that the theoretical model is for an isolated bubble and does not account for the strong interaction between consecutive bubbles; this increases a bubble's velocity and induces their coalescence, leading to a decrease in mass transferred between phases. (C) 1998 by The Combustion Institute

Language: English

Type (Professor's evaluation): Scientific

No. of pages: 15